Clarifying user request
\n
The user posted a headline and perhaps is asking for a concise summary or verification. It’s a bit ambiguous, so I should ask for clarification. I wonder if they want a translation, source verification, a summary, or background information regarding Real Madrid and Lyon, including loan terms. I can also provide some context on Endrick, the Brazilian wonderkid who will join Real Madrid in July 2024 after turning 18. However, I can't assert facts beyond my knowledge cutoff.Providing careful clarification
\n
I need to be cautious since I can't assert up-to-date news as fact. It's important to provide a caveat that I don't have live updates, but I can help verify details if given a link or by asking permission to check online. Instead of messy attempts to fetch news, I should ask the user what they specifically need—be it translation, verifying rumors, or providing background information. Since the user communicated in Chinese, I will respond in that language while offering a brief translation for clarity.Summarizing the situation
Actually, Endrick debuted and scored against England in 2024. Regarding Lyon, they struggled in the 2023-24 season but may have improved in 2024-25. Nicolò Schira, the Italian journalist, has a moderate accuracy rate for transfer news, often needing secondary sources. I can mention essential variables for a winter loan, like registration spots and eligibility. I want to check official sites for verification if the user needs me to do so. Additionally, I could help evaluate transfer terms and impacts. I’ll keep it concise and respond accordingly!Considering user permissions
It looks like I can attempt network commands if needed, but we don't have a dedicated browsing tool available. Instead of jumping into action, it's better for me to ask the user for permission first. I think I'll focus on producing a concise response to clarify this when I reach out. Keeping it straightforward will help ensure we’re on the same page before proceeding with any network-related inquiries.
这是尼科洛·斯基拉的转会爆料，可信度属“中等”：他常有独家，但需要二次来源或官宣确认。就我目前的信息，并未看到皇马或里昂的正式公告。
你希望我：
- 直接帮你联网核实并给出权威来源与结论；
- 做个简短解读：租借可能涉及的条款、对皇马/里昂与恩德里克发展的影响；
- 仅做标题翻译或摘要？
\n
